16 - When to Say Yes: Using the Model for Collaborative Evaluations to ethically guide decisions of client & evaluator fit

Abstract Information: In the realm of collaborative evaluations, the ethical alignment between clients and evaluators is crucial for ensuring the integrity and validity of the evaluation process. This poster delves into the ethical considerations surrounding the decision-making process regarding client and evaluator fit, utilizing the Model for Collaborative Evaluations as a guiding framework (MCE). The MCE serves as a comprehensive tool for evaluators to navigate the complexities of collaborative evaluation engagements while upholding ethical standards and principles. The poster aims to provide attendees with a deeper understanding of the key components, principles, and applications of the Model for Collaborative Evaluations, emphasizing its role in promoting ethical conduct throughout the evaluation journey. By prioritizing the individuals involved in the evaluation process, the model underscores the importance of considering their perspectives, needs, and expectations. Through this focus, evaluators can foster a sense of inclusivity and collaboration, thereby enhancing the overall quality, validity, and use of the evaluation outcomes. By establishing clear expectations of the ethical guidelines upfront, the model helps mitigate potential misunderstandings and conflicts that may arise during the evaluation process. This clarity of communication not only builds trust between clients and evaluators but also ensures accountability and integrity in decision-making. Furthermore, the MCE encourages reflective practices among both clients and evaluators. The model enables stakeholders to critically evaluate their roles, goals, and collaborative capacities by creating opportunities for introspection and self-assessment. This reflective process not only fosters continuous improvement but also facilitates more meaningful and productive collaboration between clients and evaluators. There are numerous benefits when collaborative evaluations are implemented; they can overcome many challenges. Common obstacles such as resource constraints, communication issues, conflicting priorities, data limitations, unrealistic expectations, and stakeholder resistance are addressed during planning and throughout the evaluation process. By incorporating the principles and strategies outlined in the MCE, evaluators can proactively address these challenges and navigate them with ethical integrity and professionalism. In summary, this poster offers a comprehensive exploration of the ethical considerations surrounding client and evaluator fit in collaborative evaluations, framed within the context of the Model for Collaborative Evaluations. Attendees will gain valuable insights into how the model can be applied to their own evaluation practices, helping them and their prospective clients get to the yes!